- News
- Insights
- Bunkerworld .
- Search for renewable methanol may mean more varied bunker locations: Maersk
.
-
May 18
-
May 13
-
May 11
-
May 4
-
Apr 26
-
Apr 22
-
Apr 11
-
Apr 7
-
Apr 6
-
Mar 23
-
Mar 15
-
Mar 8
-
Feb 28
-
Feb 11
-
Feb 2
-
Feb 1
-
Jan 17
-
Dec 27
-
Dec 10
-
Dec 3
-
Nov 25
-
Nov 16
-
Oct 29
-
Oct 25
-
Oct 12
-
Oct 8
-
Oct 4
-
Sep 30
-
Sep 29
-
Sep 24
-
Sep 23
-
Sep 17
-
Sep 10
-
Sep 9
-
Sep 6
-
Aug 30
-
Aug 27
-
Aug 23
-
Aug 20
-
Aug 17
-
Aug 13
-
Aug 9
-
Aug 3
-
Jul 29
-
Jul 26
-
Jul 22
-
Jul 15
-
Jul 5
-
Jul 2
-
Jun 28
-
Jun 22
-
Jun 18
-
Jun 11
-
Jun 7
-
Jun 4
-
May 31
-
May 28
-
May 25
-
May 21
-
May 5
-
Apr 28
-
Apr 27
-
Apr 26
-
Apr 23
-
Apr 22
-
Apr 19
-
Apr 16
-
Apr 15
-
Apr 14
-
Apr 13
-
Apr 9
-
Apr 7
-
Apr 5
-
Mar 31
-
Mar 23
-
Mar 19
-
Mar 17
-
Mar 12
-
Mar 5
-
Mar 4
-
Mar 3
-
Mar 1
-
Feb 25
-
Feb 24
-
Feb 22
-
Feb 17
-
Feb 12
-
Feb 10
-
Feb 9
-
Feb 5
-
Feb 1
-
Jan 27
-
Jan 25
-
Jan 22
-
Jan 20
-
Jan 18
-
Jan 13
-
Jan 11
-
Jan 8
-
Jan 7
-
Jan 4
-
Dec 31
-
Dec 28
-
Dec 24
-
Dec 21
-
Dec 14
-
Dec 9
-
Dec 9
-
Dec 8
-
Dec 4
-
Dec 2
-
Dec 1
-
Nov 30
-
Nov 27
-
Nov 25
-
Nov 23
-
Nov 17
-
Nov 16
-
Nov 11
-
Nov 10
-
Nov 6
-
Nov 5
-
Nov 4
-
Nov 2
-
Oct 29
-
Oct 27
-
Oct 23
-
Oct 22
-
Oct 20
-
Oct 14
-
Oct 12
-
Oct 6
-
Oct 5
-
Sep 30
-
Sep 29
-
Sep 25
-
Sep 21
-
Sep 18
-
Sep 16
-
Sep 15
-
Sep 14
-
Sep 9
-
Sep 8
-
Sep 4
-
Sep 2
-
Aug 31
-
Aug 27
-
Aug 25
-
Aug 20
-
Aug 19
-
Aug 14
-
Aug 12
-
Aug 7
-
Aug 6
-
Aug 4
-
Jul 31
-
Jul 30
-
Jul 29
-
Jul 28
-
Jul 24
-
Jul 20
-
Jul 16
-
Jul 13
-
Jul 9
-
Jul 9
-
Jul 7
-
Jun 30
-
Jun 26
-
Jun 25
-
Jun 23
-
Jun 22
-
Jun 22
-
Jun 19
-
Jun 16
-
Jun 10
-
Jun 9
-
Jun 5
-
Jun 2
-
May 29
-
May 26
-
May 21
-
May 20
-
May 15
-
May 12
-
May 8
-
May 5
-
May 4
-
May 1
-
Apr 28
-
Apr 24
-
Apr 23
-
Apr 22
-
Apr 21
-
Apr 20
-
Apr 17
-
Apr 16
-
Apr 16
-
Apr 3
Container giant Maersk’s announcement of eight deepsea vessels to run on sustainable methanol will stretch supply lines and may mean a shake-up of favored bunkering locations amid higher prices, a company official said Aug. 31.
There will be a roughly two-fold increase in the cost of fueling these ships, Maersk’s head of decarbonization innovation and business development Jacob Sterling told S&P Global Platts.
The renewable methanol will cost at least as much as conventional fuel oil on a metric ton basis and as methanol’s density is around half of fuel oil’s this implies the renewable fuel will cost about twice as much, he said.
S&P Global Platts data for conventionally-produced methanol and for fuel oil broadly corroborates this pricing relationship, allowing for uncertainty about the cost of renewable methanol.
Platts assessed methanol T2 FOB at Rotterdam at $448.51/mt Aug.31 and delivered 0.5% sulfur fuel oil at Rotterdam at $519/mt. This works out at $20.90/gigajoule and $11.90/gj, respectively, showing conventional methanol as almost twice the price of fuel oil.
Platts said Aug. 13 it was proposing to launch daily methanol bunker fuel price assessments, effective Sept. 27.
Maersk’s eight 16,000 twenty foot-equivalent unit vessels, which were announced Aug. 24, imply annual demand of 300,000-360,000 mt of renewably-sourced methanol, depending on factors like deployment and operational requirements, Sterling said. There is the potential for an additional four ships in 2025.
The whole Maersk container fleet consumed 10.344 million mt of marine fuel in 2020, the company’s annual report showed.
“All future new buildings will be dual-fueled and ready for carbon neutral operation, but there are no concrete plans for more ships,” Sterling said.
The new methanol-powered vessels were announced after Maersk had already said it had signed an off-take agreement with renewable energy suppliers REintegrate and European Energy to establish a new Danish facility to produce approximately 10,000 mt/year of carbon-neutral methanol.
Discussions with other potential suppliers of renewable methanol are under way but securing the 360,000 mt for the new vessels will be a challenge and could mean less of a focus for the methanol-powered ships on traditional bunker hubs, such as Rotterdam, than for conventionally-fueled ships, Sterling said.
“Especially in the beginning, we will have to be a little creative about where we bunker… Especially in the first years, when the supply of green methanol will be scattered in different places,” he said.
To some extent this is business as normal as vessels already bunker where fuel is cheapest and so there is already flexibility in fuel purchasing for the company, he added.
“We will try to bring the bunkering as close to the production of the fuel as possible,” Sterling said.
There is the potential for a shake-up in bunkering locations as the shipping industry makes progress with its energy transition, market watchers have said.
Brazil, India, Mauritius and Malaysia could see their main ports develop as bunkering locations with the right regulatory and financial backing, as the maritime sector pivots from petroleum-based fuels to greener options, the World Bank said in April.
Access to renewable energy resources or to natural gas to use in conjunction with carbon capture will be key, as will shipping volumes calling at a country’s ports, the bank said in its "The Potential of Zero-Carbon Bunker Fuels in Developing Countries" report.
However, while key bunkering locations for ships running on renewable fuel may show more variation than conventionally-fueled vessels do, shipping routes themselves will not change, Sterling said.
Closing the price gap
Putting a price on carbon will be crucial to making new bunker fuels economically viable, Sterling said.
The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme will expand to include CO2 emissions from shipping for the first time, according to draft legislation unveiled by the European Commission July 14. This system will cover two thirds of the sector's CO2 emissions -- estimated at 90 million mt, the European Commission said.
The system will cover emissions from ships calling at an EU port or voyages within the EU as well as 50% of the emissions from voyages starting or ending outside the EU, and emissions that occur when ships are at berth in EU ports.
“We are engaging actively with the EU on pushing it in the right direction so that it actually achieves real and meaningful reductions of the greenhouse gas impact of shipping,” Sterling said. “What’s really important for us is that when you look at fuels you look at not only CO2 emissions but also CO2 equivalents,” he said.
This includes methane and calls into question LNG as a sustainable shipping fuel, Sterling said.
Global progress, as dictated by the International Maritime Organization, is slow, Sterling said.
A proposal by the Marshall Islands and Solomon Islands to introduce a levy of $100/mt of CO2 equivalent on oil used as a bunkering fuel was not adopted by the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee in June. This is due to be discussed at an intersessional working group in October.
“We would like to see a global carbon tax of $150/mtCO2e, which in terms of [conventional fuel] is equivalent to around $450-$500/mt,” Sterling said.
Q2 saw the start of methanol bunkering at the port of Rotterdam, with volumes at 250 mt total, data from the port authority showed.
Methanol is receiving growing attention as a bunker fuel but still lags behind LNG. Taking the clean tanker segment, owners are investing in vessels that will run on methanol, LNG, and in a few cases on battery propulsion, analysts at S&P Global Platts Analytics said. “Our base case 2030 fleet model forecasts that 440 LNG dual fuel vessel are delivered compared with 79 methanol fueled vessels along with a handful of other alternative fuels,” it said.
This equates to 0.5% of the 2030 fleet, the analysts added.
Bunkerworld .,